New conversation piece: Oceans as Trash Cans

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Bunny.

We have a very nice interview with Captain Charles Moore of Algalita Marine Research Foundation - click here to read it.

By the way, Capt. Moore and crew just finished their month-long 2008 expedition through the North Pacific Gyre. The AMRF website has an excellent blog with lots of photos that documents the entire voyage with daily entries. If you like the PS interview I think you will enjoy reading the blog too. You can find it here (note: the entries are posted blog-style, with the earliest entries at the bottom of the page and the most recent at the top - in other words you gotta read these things backwards).

Stay away from those plastics.

~B.

I Miss Hawaii

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Pinky.

Coming back to the desert is always nice (because I do love the desert) but after staying in Hawaii for over a month I guess I'm feeling a little sad. And cold. I don't know exactly why I feel sad but I do. I don't know how long this feeling will last.

We were really busy the whole time we were there so I didn't have much time to 'play' or do anything that wasn't research or production-related. A couple times Bunny or Daisy suggested that maybe I could spend some time looking for my mommy but in the end I didn't do any of that. I wouldn't know where to start and I don't even know what she looks like. As you probably know lots of times kittens don't look anything like their mommies.

Bunny, Daisy, and I all learned a huge amount from the Hawaii-people while we were there. I hope you don't mind if I don't summarize everything we did in Hawaii right now - it's too much stuff to list and my head is crowded with ideas that need sorting. The noise in my head is similar to children smashing Lego with small hammers. I'll just try to bring everything together in the Hawaii episodes we're working on.

On the way back we stopped in Los Angeles and spent a few days there - UCLA's research libraries in the evenings and a bunch of assorted interesting stuff during the days: we saw the Takashi Murakami exhibition at the Geffen (just amazing); visited the National Resources Defense Council offices in Santa Monica (we're going to try to do an episode about environmental racism with them); Museum of Jurassic Technology (again, I love that place) and the Center for Land Use Interpretation (first time for me, I was really impressed) in Culver City (not far from where Bunny and I first met); and we even took a day trip up to San Simeon with our friend Tim to see Hearst Castle (truly nauseating/fascinating).​

These are from the Murakami show. Thank you Pam for the lovely buttons.

Oh so ironic to find this parking sign in Los Angeles (the space was empty).

Indoor swimming pool, Hearst Castle.

Traveling can be fun but it's a really wonderful to all be back together in one place again. I missed Mimi and Kim a lot. One nice thing about being away is that while we were gone Kim did a bunch of blogging and decided that it's not so bad. So according to her she'll be blogging "sometimes" from now on. It would be great if Mimi would blog too, she always has an interesting (some might say 'bizarre') way of looking at things. We spent a few days sorting through the mountain of material we brought back from Hawaii and I think we have a pretty good outline for how to proceed now.

I just read through this entry and it's quite a mess with all the jumping from topic to topic, isn't it? I'll try again tomorrow. I think I'm tired; my eyes are throbbing. @.@

Finally, before I head off to bed, I wanted to extend my deepest 'thank you' to everyone that has been teaching and helping us these past few weeks and months: Eiko, Karen, Candace, Callie, Dean, Heijin, Jackie, Lianne, Bianca, Po'ohina, Bunzie, Fran, Daniela, Brian, Kekuni, Terri, Kyle, Joan & Puhipau, Paul, Richard & Nancy, Bok-dong, Nancy, Jon, Teacup, Tinkerbell, Su-Fei, Tim, Maya & Emi, Pam, Tim's Mommy & Daddy, Jon's Mommy & Daddy, Stan, Dennis, Lori, and Lisa. I'm sure I've forgotten to include everyone - my sincerest apologies.

~pinky

Hawaii -> Los Angeles -> Desert

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Bunny.

Hi. Pinky and I are finally back in the desert and production on our multi-part Hawaii project is already moving forward. Tentatively we are thinking that it will end up being a four-part project. Part 1 is a two-take quickie tour of the island of Oahu and kind of functions like an introduction. Part 2 is about colonialism and settler colonialism. Part 3 is a case study of colonial space. Part 4 is kind of like an oral history piece. We may add other parts later. Hawaii is an amazing and complex place and I hope we will be going back soon in order to learn more.

Also the fish in Hawaii is fantastic.

~B.​

Pinky Show Presents

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Bunny.

Just posted our newest 'episode'. It is a re-presentation of an excellent documentary made in 2006 by Na Maka o ka Aina for Earthjustice, the non-profit public interest law firm. A quick summary:

When the biotech industry decides to use the lands and people of Hawaii as its test guinea pig, local farmers, activists, researchers, and others speak out.

You can watch the video here.

~B.​

I Officially Do Not Understand Americans

Added on by Guest User.

Another diary entry by Kim.

Americans love polls. And polls love politics. Here are some polling Q&A that made my head hurt:

• Over one-third of Americans believe that America is 'not ready' for a woman president. (CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll, December 2006) Is there something wrong with women that I don't know about?

• 41% of Americans would not vote for a presidential candidate if s/he were homosexual, even if s/he were well-qualified (Gallup Poll, December 2007). According to a 2006 Gallup Poll, 91% of Americans say that they believe that America is 'not ready' for a gay or lesbian president. (Incidentally, another poll [CNN/ORC Poll, May 2007] found that 71% of Americans feel that policies towards gays and lesbians are either "Moderately Important" [30%] or "Not That Important" [41%]!)

• 48% of Americans would not vote for an atheist. (Gallup Poll, December 2007)

• 45% of Americans say they would be 'less likely' to vote for a presidential candidate if they were Muslim. (Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, and pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, August, 2007)

• Americans are 'less likely' to vote for a Mormon (29%) than someone who's been divorced twice (26%). (ABC News/Washington Post Poll, February 2007).

• 14% of Americans say that political lobbyists have 'too little' power and influence in Washington D.C. 18% think nonprofit organizations have 'too much' power and influence. (Harris Poll, February, 2007)

• 58% of Americans feel that corruption is 'widespread' in Washington. (CBS News/New York Times Poll, October 2006)

• When asked "How much of what is said in commercials for or against a political candidate do you believe?", 69% of Americans answered with 'not much' or 'nothing at all'.

• A CBS news poll (January 2008) asked the question: "Which one is more important to you in a presidential candidate: having the right experience, or having fresh ideas?" Most Democrats favored 'fresh ideas' while most Republicans favored "right experience". I don't think this is a good poll because it did not provide alternative choices such as "stale ideas" or "wrong experience", or even various permutations of the above - for example, "the right experience with wrong ideas", which is what I would have selected had I been polled.

Okay, I lie down now.​ ~kk.

Let Bender Vote!

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Bunny.

The past few weeks Pinky has been at the library practically every night so until she is done with her Hawaii-research you get me or Kim writing blogs.

Last night I was watching some old Futurama cartoons and came across this:​

​[ funny Futurama video that used to be here deleted from internet ]

That's funny.

But it also made me think. When Bender (the robot guy) said that he can't vote because he's a former convicted felon, I wondered if that was something that's based in reality or not. So I looked it up.

Come to find out, the right to vote is different from state to state. Almost every state in the U.S. does not allow people currently in prison (felony conviction) to have any voting rights. Most states reinstate their right to vote upon release from prison (in some states there is a period of time where they can't vote right away). But in other states if you've ever been convicted of a felony you are barred from voting for life.

To me, this is unfair. What kind of 'conventional wisdom' could provide a logical argument for disenfranchising over 5 million thinking adults in this country? Universal suffrage (which I've heard people refer to the U.S. as having) is supposed to extend voting rights to all adults regardless of race, sex, beliefs, intelligence, economic status or social status.

So why are prisoners being singled out for exclusion? It's not like they're stupid. Nor are they evil (if you believe prisoners are stupid or evil you need to meet more prisoners and ex-prisoners). Do you think allowing prisoners to vote would result in the election of evil candidates? (we are not doing so well in this regard already, and they are being elected by supposedly non-evil non-ex-felons) Actually, it makes sense that we should value the votes of prisoners. I think they are a group of people who have a unique and valuable insight into matters of law, power, and the inner workings of society. They are often the people whose lives have been most directly impacted by the issues that politicians like to talk about.

Plus! If you look at who has the highest rates of convictions and incarceration in this country, I think you can make a reasonable argument that the disenfranchisement of prisoners and ex-prisoners is not only unwise but also… racist and classist? Maybe?

~Bunny.

There Are Only Two Parties

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Kim.

Not! It just seems that way. Do you know why only Republicrats get to be on TV?

Just a friendly reminder:

Green Party [ www.GP.org ]

Libertarian Party [ www.LP.org ]

Socialist Party USA [ www.sp-usa.org ]

United States Marijuana Party [ www.usmjparty.com ]

And actually there are more. I'm not endorsing any particular political party, I just wanted to remind everybody that there are parties beyond just the Republicans and Democrats.

And while you're at it, please read up on different political forms a nation can take. The United States is a constitutional republic, but what is that exactly and what does that mean? What are the alternatives?

~kk.

Death & Taxes

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Kim.

Back in 1982, after witnessing a million people protest nuclear weapons in New York's Central Park, then-U.S. Secretary of State Alexander Haig said: "Let them march all they want, as long as they continue to pay their taxes."

That's a very practical way of looking at things, isn't it?

Well. It's true that I don't want to support U.S. imperialism, which of course includes imperialist wars. It's also true that the U.S. government needs lots and lots of money to pay for imperialist wars. And I do feel sick to my stomach that over 40% of the taxes that I pay (yes, I pay taxes) are being used to buy bullets to shoot people with, and for bombs and such. I don't want to pay for this kind of thing. So I've been looking for options.

Here are some links to information I've found so far:

Don't Buy Bush's War @ CodePink

War Tax Resistance info @ War Resisters League

Taxstrike @ Against the Wall Network

2008 War Tax Boycott

It would be great if us taxpayers got to choose where to send our tax dollars. Like, "divert all my money from the military and war spending and spend it on building houses for homeless people and cleaning up the environment instead". Okay, maybe there'd be 'too much' money for the environment and not enough money for fixing pot holes in the roads, but overall I think that's a minor problem compared to our very expensive addiction to death-culture.

What do you think? I'm not an economist but the idea of a war tax boycott sounds reasonable to me.

~kk.​​

Oh My How Times Have Changed

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Kim.

While Bunny and Pinky enjoy sun and food in Hawaii, I am stuck here in 40°F weather reading Alexis de Tocqueville's Democracy in America. I'm not really complaining, it's actually very fascinating to see what kind of impressions this guy had of the United States in 'the early years' (~1831). For example, this part:

It is difficult to say what place is taken up in the life of an inhabitant of the United States by his concern for politics. To take a hand in the regulation of society and to discuss it is his biggest concern and, so to speak, the only pleasure an American knows. This feeling pervades the most trifling habits of life; even the women frequently attend public meetings and listen to political harangues as a recreation from their household labors. Debating clubs are, to a certain extent, a substitute for theatrical entertainments: an American cannot converse, but he can discuss, and his talk falls into a dissertation. He speaks to you as if he was addressing a meeting; and if he should chance to become warm in the discussion, he will say "Gentlemen" to the person with whom he is conversing.

In some countries the inhabitants seem unwilling to avail themselves of the political privileges which the law gives them; it would seem that they set too high a value upon their time to spend it on the interests of the community; and they shut themselves up in a narrow selfishness, marked out by four sunk fences and a quickset hedge. But if an American were condemned to confine his activity to his own affairs, he would be robbed of one half of his existence; he would feel an immense void in the life which he is accustomed to lead, and his wretchedness would be unbearable. I am persuaded that if ever a despotism should be established in America, it will be more difficult to overcome the habits that freedom has formed than to conquer the love of freedom itself. (from Chapter 14: WHAT ARE THE REAL ADVANTAGES WHICH AMERICAN SOCIETY DERIVES FROM A DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT)

Wow. I realize a lot can change in 200+ years but to me it sounds like America has undergone a radical personality transplant.

~k.

....................................

Posted by Bunny: Hi Kim, thanks for the blogging. If you have time I'd like to hear your thoughts on de Tocqueville's chapter on the 'three races' in America - 'Whites, Negroes, and Indians'. ]

....................................

Posted by Kim: To me, race is one of the hardest concepts for cats to understand. Why do human beings have race? Better to ask Daisy, I think.

President to Nation: We Must War of Aggression!

Added on by Guest User.

Another Diary entry by me, Kim.

Our friend Richard at Hawaii People's Fund sent us an e-mail with a link to some great information today. It is called Iraq: The War Card: Orchestrated Deception on the Path to War, and is a section of The Center for Public Integrity's website. There are some analytical commentaries and also an archive of 'old' (2002 seems like a long time ago already) video footage of Bush administration people hyping the case for war, an excellent bibliography, and so on. I just spent the last 3 or 4 hours reviewing the information and it is very good. There's actually no "new" information here - I think we pretty much read up on this stuff while we were researching our own Iraq War episode - but I am very happy that some people are willing to take the time to put so much information together in a way that I can go back and rethink what has happened.​

example graph from the War Card website.

example graph from the War Card website.

Pinky is always reminding us how important it is to study history. If we don't study history of course it's going to be harder to see what's being done to us right now in the present. Like Iran. If the American people do not stop their government from warring on Iran, I will be even more disgusted and angry.

Angry cats!

Now I am reading about How to Buy a President. I know I am not in a position to suggest ideas but I would like to see a companion website called How to Have Democracy. (not fake democracy)​

New Episode: What's Wrong with GMOs?

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Bunny.

We have a new Pinky Show Radio episode. Today's topic: What's Wrong with GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms)? It's an interview with Jeffrey Smith, founder of the Institute for Responsible Technology. It's a fairly in-depth interview (almost 45 minutes) - a nice change from the typical 5-minute radio story or 1-minute news story. You can listen to the show here.

~B.

Food: GMO or Not?

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Kim.

Short post today, I'm in the middle of a really good book.

Bunny has been doing a lot of research about GMO (Genetically Modified Organisms) lately. I like food so of course the big question for me when I am marketing is "What should I be avoiding?". Here is a good list that she sent me yesterday:

http://www.truefoodnow.org/shoppersguide/guide_printable.html

Also make sure you check out the rest of the True Food Network website too. It's a good website to keep you up to date on the ongoing struggle to keep food healthy and safe.

I'll post other good lists when I find them.

~k.

January 20 is National Sanctity of Human Life Day

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Kim.

Still guest blogging for Pinky until she is back from Hawaii.

In the news: On Friday, President Bush made a proclamation that kind of blew my mind. Here it is:

On National Sanctity of Human Life Day, we recognize that each life has inherent dignity and matchless value, and we reaffirm our steadfast determination to defend the weakest and most vulnerable members of our society.

America was founded on the belief that all men are created equal and have an inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and our country remains committed to upholding that founding principle. Since taking office, I have signed legislation to help protect life at all stages, and my Administration will continue to encourage adoption, fund abstinence education and crisis pregnancy programs, and support faith-based groups. Today, as our society searches for new ways to ease human suffering, we must pursue the possibilities of science in a manner that respects the sacred gift of life and upholds our moral values.

Our Nation has made progress in its efforts to protect human life, and we will strive to change hearts and minds with compassion and decency. On National Sanctity of Human Life Day and throughout the year, we help strengthen the culture of life in America and work for the day when every child is welcomed in life and protected in law.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim Sunday, January 20, 2008, as National Sanctity of Human Life Day. I call upon all Americans to recognize this day with appropriate ceremonies and to underscore our commitment to respecting and protecting the life and dignity of every human being.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighteenth day of January, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second.

- GEORGE W. BUSH

When I read this my first thought was, "Is this a prank?" Because really - is there anybody out there with a track record like his (human rights abuses, war criminality, shredding constitutional rights, etc.) that would allow themselves to speak publicly about "defending the weakest and most vulnerable members of our society" or "respecting and protecting the life and dignity of every human being"? Of course not! Any normal person would feel too ashamed.

I was confused enough that I finally called Daisy to ask him about it. Well Daisy explained to me that President Bush is not contradicting himself at all. He said that my confusion was coming from the fact that people like President Bush just have a different definition of human life. He said President Bush and his friends only believe in the sanctity of human life in that time frame beginning with conception, right up until 1 second before you're born.

Okay, that helped a lot. You know, politics wouldn't be so hard to understand if politicians would just include definitions and explanatory footnotes whenever they try to say something.

~k.

....................................

Posted by Bunny: Kim said "President Bush and his friends only believe in the sanctity of human life in that time frame beginning with conception, right up until 1 second before you're born." I would add that these people also believe that from the moment of birth onwards, your body belongs to the state.

Would You Like Some (cloned) Cheese With That?

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Kim.

Kim filling in blogging duties again for Pinky while she is in Hawaii.

Guess what. This past Tuesday, the FDA (Food and Drug Association) approved flesh and fluids (a.k.a. 'meat & milk') from cloned animals:

"Meat and milk from clones of cattle, swine, and goats, and the offspring of clones from any species traditionally consumed as food, are as safe to eat as food from conventionally bred animals." - FDA official Randall Lutter

Considering the FDA's dismal food safety record (especially with corporate profiteering lurking in the background), I am not feeling comforted by this recent turn of events.

The decision represents a major step towards allowing biotech corporations to put clone-derived products on supermarket shelves. And maybe even more disturbingly, the FDA has also decided that meat & milk from cloned animals do not need to be labeled as such. Here in the U.S.A., GMO (Genetically Modified Organisms) foodstuffs also don't need to be labeled, so basically no one is able to decide for themselves if they want to eat cloned-derived and GMO foods. Without labeling, none of us can know what we are eating. Or, for that matter, what's making us sick.

[ read the Agence France-Presse article ]

~k.

....................................

Posted by Bunny: Fluids. Is milk?

Learning from Hawaii

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Pinky.

Bunny and I arrived early in the morning on Sunday. What can I say? I'm just really happy to be back in Hawaii. Hawaii smells good. Everybody we've been meeting here has been really kind to us. I was born in Hawaii so I'm pretty familiar with the food here, but for Bunny a lot of the stuff we've been having on this trip so far is new and it's been quite shocking to see how much she can eat when she likes what she sees on the table. Not that I'm suggesting that she's fat (she's not).

We're here to do research and collect materials for an upcoming mini-series on Hawaii. Most people think of Hawaii as an island paradise / tourist destination. But what most people don't realize is that Hawaii is also a settler colony. Our upcoming episodes will explain what that means and why it's important to think about.

Financially speaking, these upcoming episodes have been made possible by two grants we recently received - mahalo (thank you) to The Hawaii People's Fund and the Hawaii Community Foundation! Mimi had written to them asking if they'd be willing to fund an episode or two on settler colonialism, and to our surprise they actually said 'yes'! I say 'surprised' because: 1) the settler colonialism argument is still 'controversial' here in the U.S. (even though it's so obviously true if you just consider the facts!); and 2) for the past year Mimi has been tirelessly applying to all sorts of grants but so far we have only gotten rejection letters.

So needless to say we are really happy to receive these grants. It's not only a big financial lift but equally important for us it is also a big emotional lift. We were starting to think that foundations are allergic to cats or something. So I would like to send Mimi a special thank you for all her hard work. People don't know that Mimi works long hours at her 'real job' and then after that she comes home, sits down, and then she does all the grantwriting for The Pinky Show. So she basically has almost no time in her life for play or just relaxation.

Okay, tonight I was actually going to write about GMO (Genetically Modified Organisms) stuff but as you can see I got side-tracked. Since we got here Bunny and I have been learning about GMO kalo (taro) and the more I learn, the angrier I get! What's happening here with kalo is just like what's going on on the mainland (and elsewhere) with corporations trying to 'own', control, and profit from all aspects of nature. Corn, wild rice, soy, wheat, and many other things have already been deeply affected. Here in Hawaii kalo is considered to be the ancestor of the Hawaiian people. Kalo is their relative. So corporations claiming the right to own and modify kalo seems to me like a totally disrespectful and inappropriate thing to do. I'm truly disgusted by what I'm seeing. We didn't come to Hawaii to work on an episode about kalo but hopefully next time we'll be able to do that. In the meantime, please watch this video - it's called Islands at Risk (30 mintutes long). Also, an excellent documentary to watch for background information about GMO is The Future of Food. This is a must-see documentary - all your perspectives about food and nature will be changed after watching this.

I have to go prepare for tomorrow now. Thank you for reading.

~p.

President Bush: "I Also Hate Whales..."

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Kim.

OK, he never actually said that. But articles like this really makes me think that President Bush has a personal vendetta against nature-in-general. Do you think maybe he was bullied by trees as a child?

[ excerpt from a Washington Post story by Marc Kaufman ]

The White House yesterday sought to overrule a federal court's decision limiting the Navy's use of sonar in training exercises, exempting the service from complying with two major environmental laws.

Environmentalists who sued to limit the use of loud, mid-frequency sonar — which can be harmful to whales and other marine mammals — said the exemptions were unprecedented and could lead to a larger legal battle over the extent to which the military has to follow environmental laws.

In a court filing yesterday, government attorneys said President Bush had determined that allowing the use of mid-frequency sonar in ongoing exercises off southern California was "essential to national security" and of "paramount interest to the United States." ...The government filings said the federal ruling limiting sonar use "profoundly interferes with the Navy's global management of U.S. strategic forces, its ability to conduct warfare operations, and ultimately places the lives of American sailors and Marines at risk."

..."The president's action is an attack on the rule of law," said Reynolds, director of the Marine Mammal Protection Project. "By exempting the Navy from basic safeguards under both federal and state law, the President is flouting the will of Congress, the decision of the California Coastal Commission, and a ruling by the federal court." ...The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) said the waters off southern California are especially rich in marine mammal life and are on migration paths of five species of endangered whales.

In the past these Navy sonar 'exercises' have left whales stranded or dead. Stop messing with whales!

~k.

Aloha from Hawaii

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Bunny.

Pinky and I are now in Hawaii. We may not be able to post as many blogs while we are here (not sure about access to computers, etc.).

We are staying with a friend at her house in the middle of a rain forest. This is not like the desert at all and the humidity is making me all frizzy.

We have a busy schedule. Even in our first 24 hours here we have learned a lot. Pinky or I will report back with more as soon as we get some 'free time'.

~B.

P.S. Ahi poke is my new favorite food. It is SO GOOD.

....................................

Posted by Kim: What's ahi poke?

....................................

Posted by Bunny: I found the picture below here.

Reconfiguring (again) U.S. Universities for Maximum 'Homeland Security'

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Bunny.

Here is a must-read article regarding the current movement to bring U.S. universities into closer alignment with the national security/military superstructure. Please read this. All of us have to understand how our so-called public institutions are being used to further the new Americanism agenda.

The essay explains the seven steps involved in the transformation of U.S. universities and colleges:

1. Target dissidents.

2. Arm the schools.

3. Increase surveillance.

4. Data mine student records.

5. Track foreign students.

6. Take over the curriculum, classrooms, and laboratories.

7. Privatize everything.

Read the whole article here: Repress U, by Michael Gould-Wartofsky (from The Nation)

~B.

Bunny Mailbag: Who's Your Favorite Candidate?

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Bunny.

E-mail from ShapeSHFTR:

Dear Bunny, I enjoy reading your replies to e-mails. I have a question for you. I'm guessing that you guys are Democrats and not Republicans. So out of the major Democratic candidates - Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, or John Edwards, who will you be voting for? Who do you think is the real change candidate? And don't say Kucinich because we all know he doesn't have a chance to win the nomination! Thanks, just curious what you guys are thinking because you haven't been talking about the elections. - ShapeSHFTR

Bunny writes:

Hi ShapeSHFTR, I won't pretend to represent the others, I'll just state my own position and the others can enter their opinions below if they want.

1. As we've pointed out before, cats aren't allowed to vote. If you American human beings thought about how unfair this is for even 10 seconds you'd see that that's something that has to be changed. Who the leader of this country is has a profound effect on all animals, not only humans. I agree that some animals cannot operate a voting machine or punch a voting-card (dragonflies come to mind), but that doesn't mean that our interests should be totally ignored at election time. If you believe in fairness go figure something about re: how to collect animal votes. And I'm not even going to get into the whole trees issue.

2. The whole "You Must Be Either a Democrat or a Republican" mentality annoys me. What happens when neither side is willing to serve the interests of the citizenry? Or to put it another way, why do people have to choose between one of just two parties when both of those parties are actively hurting the most vulnerable among us? Poor people, the elderly, children, the homeless, recent immigrants, Native peoples, and so on. I would call the narrowness of your human elections a joke if the repercussions weren't so enormously un-funny.

3. I like some things about each of the candidates as people. All of them seem intelligent, which can be nice. Visually speaking, they all have decent smiles, et cetera. But as political candidates, the three you've named - Clinton, Obama, Edwards - I don't like their politics. Just one example, their positions regarding the expansion of war-culture, an issue we have spoken about a lot here at The Pinky Show.

Hillary Clinton: To help our forces recover from Iraq and prepare them to confront the full range of twenty-first-century threats, I will work to expand and modernize the military so that fighting wars no longer comes at the expense of deployments for long-term deterrence, military readiness, or responses to urgent needs at home.

John Edwards: I will double the budget for recruitment and raise the standards for the recruitment pool so that we can reduce our reliance on felony waivers and other exceptions. In addition, I will increase our investment in the maintenance of our equipment for the safety of our troops.

Barack Obama: To renew American leadership in the world, we must immediately begin working to revitalize our military. A strong military is, more than anything, necessary to sustain peace. . . . We must use this moment both to rebuild our military and to prepare it for the missions of the future. . . . We should expand our ground forces by adding 65,000 soldiers to the army and 27,000 marines. . . . I will not hesitate to use force, unilaterally if necessary, to protect the American people or our vital interests whenever we are attacked or imminently threatened. We must also consider using military force in circumstances beyond self-defense in order to provide for the common security that underpins global stability — to support friends, participate in stability and reconstruction operations, or confront mass atrocities...

[ excerpts from Glenn Greenwald's excellent essay at Salon ]

4. Seems like every time Kucinich's name is mentioned, it's in the context of some kind of mockery or dismissive "interesting but not to be taken seriously" comment. What's funny to me is that if people would only follow-up with some critical inquiry as to why this is happening, they might actually figure out a thing or two about what's wrong with elections here in the United States.

I'm not impressed with the American political system. You human beings will get exactly what you deserve. Unfortunately for the rest of us who also live on this planet, we'll also get what you deserve.

~B.

Unlearning How to Not Kill

Added on by Guest User.

Posted by Pinky.

I was reading an essay by Penny Coleman (Flashback: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Suicide and the Lessons of War) and was especially intrigued by this section describing the psychological 'conditioning' of soldiers:

Since World War II, our military has sought and found any number of ways to override the values and belief systems recruits have absorbed from their families, schools, communities and religions. Using the principles of operant conditioning, the military has found ways to reprogram their human software, overriding those characteristics that are inconvenient in a military context, most particularly the inherent resistance human beings have to killing others of their own species. "Modern combat training conditions soldiers to act reflexively to stimuli," says Lt. Col. Peter Kilner, a professor of philosophy and ethics at West Point, "and this maximizes soldiers' lethality, but it does so by bypassing their moral autonomy. Soldiers are conditioned to act without considering the moral repercussions of their actions; they are enabled to kill without making the conscious decision to do so. If they are unable to justify to themselves the fact that they killed another human being, they will likely — and understandably — suffer enormous guilt. This guilt manifests itself as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and it has damaged the lives of thousands of men who performed their duty in combat."

By military standards, operant conditioning has been highly effective. It's enabled American soldiers to kill more often and more efficiently, and that ability continues to exact a terrible toll on those we have designated as the "enemy." But the toll on the troops themselves is also tragic. Even when troops struggle honorably with the difference between a protected person and a permissible target (and I believe that the vast majority do so struggle, though the distinction is one I find both ethically and humanely problematic) in war "shit happens." When soldiers are witness to overwhelming horror, or because of a reflexive accident, an illegitimate order, or because multiple deployments have thoroughly distorted their perceptions, or simply because they are in the wrong place at the wrong time — those are the moments that will continue to haunt them, the memories they will not be able to forgive or forget, and the stuff of posttraumatic stress injuries.

I've been thinking about this all day. Seems to me that when human beings are in their childhood-stage, the adults around them try to teach them things like how to treat each other nicely, how to discern right from wrong, how to think about the consequences of their actions, and other good stuff like that. But doesn't this curriculum for soldiers - this 'operant conditioning' that teaches barely-adult human beings how to bypass the moral autonomy they (hopefully) developed as children - seem like exactly the opposite of good 'child rearing'?

I don't get it. If human beings think warring is so necessary, why not just avoid the possibility of confusion, horror, and trauma by training children (i.e., potential soldiers) to be killers from the start? I mean, don't get me wrong, I'd rather do away with war altogether, but since most people won't even allow themselves to seriously explore that as a possibility, perhaps it just makes more sense to speed things along a bit by not cultivating any goodness that's only going to be have to be destroyed later.

At the very least, all of us cats will be saved the hassle of having to figure out if that human being coming towards us is going to be kind or try to hurt us.

~p.

....................................

Addition: Sorry, I forgot to post the link to Ms. Coleman's essay from which I quoted: http://www.alternet.org/story/72956/